Although not apparent to me upon
initially reading “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” after reading Winesburg,
Ohio, I now see many similarities between the works. In many ways for example
Prufrock is portrayed like a grotesque as defined in “Book of the Grotesques”.
Firstly, the structures of both
works are very fragmented. Prufrock can be divided up into six sections that each
appear to have their own meaning. Each fragment of the poem reveals another
aspect of Prufrock’s story; however, there are reoccurring themes that are present
throughout the story that connect the fragments together. To gain a full
understanding of the text, each fragment must be read in context of the rest of
the poem interpreted with the greater meaning of the whole poem in mind. Similarly,
Winesburg, Ohio, which is a short
story cycle, is told in fragments of bits and pieces of time in George Willard’s
life. Again, though each chapter is a separate
story of its own, each story adds to the greater meaning of the work as a
whole. In both works, this fragmentation is indicative of the isolation experiences
by characters—Prufrock in “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” and
the grotesques in Winesburg, Ohio.
They are unconnected parts whose separateness is contrasted by their desire to
be part of a whole.
Consistent
with the fragmentation, a lack of understanding is also a reoccurring theme throughout
both works. Throughout the poem, Prufrock seeks understanding so that he can answer
the “overwhelming question”. Prufrock presents the dilemma of the meaning vs
meaninglessness of life in a mundane world. Prufrock also seeks understanding
from others and he feels alienated because he is unable to properly communicate. He
says “That is not what I meant at all/That is not it, at all” on line 97 and “it
is impossible to say just what I mean!” on line 104 which reveals his desire to
not only gain a personal understanding, but to also be understood by others. Likewise, the grotesques in Winesburg, Ohio are
characterized by a lack of understanding and the inability to communicate. Many
of the grotesques for example don’t fully understand what makes them grotesque
such as Wing Biddlebaum who says “There’s something wrong, but I don’t want to
know what it is. His hands have something to do with his fear of me and of everyone.”
Due to their lack of understanding of the nature of their grotesqueness, the
grotesques are stuck in this state as they are unable to break free from it. They can't free themselves from it because they don't know what causes it. In
addition to this, like Prufrock, the grotesques also are unable to effectively communicate
with others. Enoch for example, “knew what he wanted to say, but he knew also
that he could never by any possibility say it” which strongly represents
Prufrock’s quote where he says that “It is impossible to say what I mean”. This
lack of communication leads to the alienation of Prufrock and the grotesques and
ultimately limits them from gaining the fully understanding that they seek.
No comments:
Post a Comment