“2.7 million children
in Egypt don’t have a childhood.” This compelling public print ad wants to
bring awareness to millions of Egyptian children who must forgo childhood in
order to begin working a make enough money for their families. The ad depicts a
young boy working in a repair shop fit for a grown man. He is shown to be a boy
who is already living the life of a grown man. Robbed of his childhood, he
spends much of his time working; he has no time to play. The boy is so small
that he wouldn't be able to reach many of the tools without climbing on a
ladder. The shop is dirty and many of the tools in the background appear
dangerous. This is not a fit location for a young boy to be. The boy on the
left side of the picture who is seen wearing a blue and white flannel shirt is
already growing patches of gray hair on the sides of his head, symbolic of the
stress and hard work that this boy has to endure. The skin on his face is worn
like that of a grown man who does laborious work. On his forehead, the boy has
a scar, likely from an accident while working, an indication of the dangers of
his job. Bags are apparent under his eyes due to the lack of sleep. However,
despite his body showing signs of stress and overwork, the boy’s eyes still
retain the innocent look of a young boy. As he looks the viewer in the eyes, he
sparks a sense of awe that would make anyone feel bad for flipping the page of
their magazine without doing anything to help him. The colors in the picture are very washed out
which give the picture a very dreary tone. The lack of vibrant colors indicates
the lack of fun which is instead is replaced by dull times. What’s powerful
about this ad is that it reads, “2.7
million children in Egypt don’t have a childhood.” The sheer number of
children who are working in these conditions and deprived of their childhood
because of work shows that this is a huge problem that needs to be addressed.
In the bottom right of the ad, it says, “Call
Us. 012 1817 555” The font is so small however that it is difficult to read
the number which hurts the cause if those who want to help can’t do so because
they can’t read the number to call. This
ad speaks to everyone, including people who have lived a privileged childhood
and now from firsthand experience the joys that it should bring and people who
come an underprivileged background and understand the hardships that you must
endure to survive in similar situations. Similar incidents of child labor used
to happen in the United States before child labor laws were passed that
prohibited employers from working young people in unsafe conditions. Though
Egypt has similar laws, they seem to be ineffective in solving the problem.
Thursday, October 31, 2013
The Snow Man
The Snow Man
“One must have a mind of winter
To regard the frost and the boughs
Of the pine-trees crusted with snow;
And have been cold a long time
To behold the junipers shagged with ice,
The spruces rough in the distant glitter
Of the January sun; and not to think
Of any misery in the sound of the wind,
In the sound of a few leaves,
Which is the sound of the land
Full of the same wind
That is blowing in the same bare place
For the listener, who listens in the snow,
And, nothing himself, beholds
Nothing that is not there and the nothing that is.”
~Wallace
Stevens
While reading Grendel, we have discussed illusion vs.
reality. On page 22, Grendel says “I create the whole universe blink by
blink.—An ugly god pitifully dying in a tree!” which suggests that one’s
reality is based upon perspective and that everyone is the creator of their
reality. As a result many ideas aren't necessarily universal such as good or evil. Similarly, in “The Snow Man”, Wallace Stevens suggests that your idea of
reality is influenced by your perspective. In the poem, Wallace compares the
different descriptions of winter from the viewpoint of a person whose reality is just what he sees and a
person who uses their perspective to understand and form his own reality .
The first stanza of the poem describes winter in a very
non-objective way. There are no interpretations. It is just a description of what is simply there. However to do this, “One must have a mind of winter”. I
believe this means that for someone to see winter for what it is without
casting judgment on it such as whether or not they like winter, they must view
it with detachment and indifference.
Now the description of winter in the second stanza sharply
contrasts the description of it in the first stanza. While in the first stanza
Stevens depicts winter with a very cut and dry description, in the second
stanza he offers interpretations and analysis of winter. He describes winter as
“cold” and the spruces as “rough” and thus he is offering his judgments of
winter. The second line of the stanza begins with “To behold” which gives
winter a wondrous and mystical representation. The reason why this stanza
differed so much from the first was because he allows his own perspective
and interpretations of reality to influence his description of winter. This
reveals the impact that our own beliefs and viewpoints have on our
interpretation of reality. For example, in Grendel, the Shaper doesn't change what actually happens, he changes the Dane's perception of the events.
The third stanza however suggests that it is human tendency to
try to interpret the world around us. Rather than just observing, humans
analyze and try to give meaning to things. As a result our own perception is
always shaping our perceived reality and thus two people can have different
understandings of reality even in the same situation. However if we didn't do this, we would simply be observing without interpreting and understanding what we see.
The fourth stanza suggests that we still observe the same
things even though we interpret them differently. There is a universal “sound
of the land” that we all share. Also there is “the same wind that is blowing in
the same bare place” and no matter where you are, you experience that same
wind.
The Similarities between the "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" and Winesburg, Ohio
Although not apparent to me upon
initially reading “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” after reading Winesburg,
Ohio, I now see many similarities between the works. In many ways for example
Prufrock is portrayed like a grotesque as defined in “Book of the Grotesques”.
Firstly, the structures of both
works are very fragmented. Prufrock can be divided up into six sections that each
appear to have their own meaning. Each fragment of the poem reveals another
aspect of Prufrock’s story; however, there are reoccurring themes that are present
throughout the story that connect the fragments together. To gain a full
understanding of the text, each fragment must be read in context of the rest of
the poem interpreted with the greater meaning of the whole poem in mind. Similarly,
Winesburg, Ohio, which is a short
story cycle, is told in fragments of bits and pieces of time in George Willard’s
life. Again, though each chapter is a separate
story of its own, each story adds to the greater meaning of the work as a
whole. In both works, this fragmentation is indicative of the isolation experiences
by characters—Prufrock in “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” and
the grotesques in Winesburg, Ohio.
They are unconnected parts whose separateness is contrasted by their desire to
be part of a whole.
Consistent
with the fragmentation, a lack of understanding is also a reoccurring theme throughout
both works. Throughout the poem, Prufrock seeks understanding so that he can answer
the “overwhelming question”. Prufrock presents the dilemma of the meaning vs
meaninglessness of life in a mundane world. Prufrock also seeks understanding
from others and he feels alienated because he is unable to properly communicate. He
says “That is not what I meant at all/That is not it, at all” on line 97 and “it
is impossible to say just what I mean!” on line 104 which reveals his desire to
not only gain a personal understanding, but to also be understood by others. Likewise, the grotesques in Winesburg, Ohio are
characterized by a lack of understanding and the inability to communicate. Many
of the grotesques for example don’t fully understand what makes them grotesque
such as Wing Biddlebaum who says “There’s something wrong, but I don’t want to
know what it is. His hands have something to do with his fear of me and of everyone.”
Due to their lack of understanding of the nature of their grotesqueness, the
grotesques are stuck in this state as they are unable to break free from it. They can't free themselves from it because they don't know what causes it. In
addition to this, like Prufrock, the grotesques also are unable to effectively communicate
with others. Enoch for example, “knew what he wanted to say, but he knew also
that he could never by any possibility say it” which strongly represents
Prufrock’s quote where he says that “It is impossible to say what I mean”. This
lack of communication leads to the alienation of Prufrock and the grotesques and
ultimately limits them from gaining the fully understanding that they seek.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)